Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is slightly better than the Galaxy J7 Refine, with a 79.7 score against 72.7. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G Stylus has older 11 version and Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Moto G Stylus's construction is newer, but a little bit heavier and a little thicker than the Galaxy J7 Refine.
Motorola Moto G Stylus features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has 2 GB more RAM. Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2300, more pixels per inch in the display and a larger display.
Moto G Stylus has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a way better camera than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a camera with lot more MP and a much higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.