Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z4 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, having a 79.8 score against 72.7. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Motorola Moto Z4 has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Motorola Moto Z4's design is newer, just a bit lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine.
Moto Z4 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a lot higher quantity of pixels per display inch and a larger screen. The Motorola Moto Z4 features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto Z4 has a little faster processor than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Moto Z4 has a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Moto Z4 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Moto Z4 also has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, a lot better video quality and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.