Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a global score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine's 72.7 general score. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola One Hyper has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Motorola One Hyper construction is newer than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine's, although it is a bit heavier and a little bit thicker.
The Motorola One Hyper has a more vivid display than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has more pixels per inch in the display, a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bigger display. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a little better performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola One Hyper also has a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola One Hyper has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a way higher video definition.
Motorola One Hyper counts with greater battery life than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.