Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is way better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, having a 90.5 score against 72.7. The Galaxy A90 5G design is newer and just a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine's, although it is also somewhat heavier. Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android operating system, while Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine works with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with a faster processing unit than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM. Galaxy A90 5G has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a larger screen and a higher display pixel density.
Galaxy A90 5G has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features longer battery performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 36% greater battery capacity.
Galaxy A90 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, it also counts with a much higher video definition, a way bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.