Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-06-29 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro is better than Galaxy J7 Refine, with an 81 score against 72.7. Galaxy C9 Pro's design is extremely thinner than Galaxy J7 Refine, but it's a little bit heavier and was released about a year before. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy C9 Pro has the older 6.0 Marshmallow version while Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features a little faster CPU than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a higher pixels quantity per inch of screen, a much better resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a quite larger display.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also counts with a camera with more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 256 GB against 400 GB, it also counts with 32 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.