Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Galaxy J7 Refine's 72.7 overall score. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's design is newer and way thinner than the Galaxy J7 Refine's, but it's somewhat heavier. These devices include Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version while Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy J7 Refine has a much powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better looking screen than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a lot greater screen pixel density and a way bigger screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much bigger sensor taking way better quality pictures and videos, a lot better video resolution and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.