Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-29 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is better than the Galaxy J7 Refine's 72.7 general score. Even though the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and the Galaxy J7 Refine were only released with a few months difference, Xiaomi Pocophone F1's body is just a little thicker but also a little bit lighter than the Galaxy J7 Refine.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a superior performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a way greater pixel quantity per inch of display, a little bit bigger display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a better camera than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and a less megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger sensor which gives a higher image and video quality.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB against 400 GB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has better battery performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.