Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-07-13 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Blue | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) has a general score of 86.6, which is better than the Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 general score. Apple iPhone SE (2022)'s construction is noticeably newer, extremely lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy J7 Star. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie OS.
The iPhone SE (2022) has a very superior processor than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has 2 less processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and more RAM memory. IPhone SE (2022) has a sharper display than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 750 x 1334 resolution and a quite greater number of pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Star counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 400 GB. Galaxy J7 Star counts with a very superior battery life than iPhone SE (2022), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
IPhone SE (2022) has just a bit better camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Although iPhone SE (2022) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy J7 Star. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Galaxy J7 Star, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.