Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has a global score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 score. Although Google Nexus 6P is extremely older than Galaxy J7 Star, it's design is thinner and a little bit lighter. The Google Nexus 6P has a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a much greater pixels density, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a little bit larger screen.
The Google Nexus 6P has a bit better performance than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Nexus 6P also has more RAM memory. Google Nexus 6P shoots a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a way bigger sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a little bit more memory for applications and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy J7 Star. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Google Nexus 6P, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy J7 Star, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.