Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 has a global score of 77, which is a bit better than the Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 global score. Although LG V20 is older than the Galaxy J7 Star, it's body is just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner. LG V20 has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot better 1440 x 2560 resolution, a much greater pixels count per display inch and a little bit bigger display.
LG V20 counts with a much greater storage to install games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V20 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has just a bit longer battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 3300mAh battery size. LG V20 captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a larger camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality and a more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The LG V20 costs a little more money than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.