Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is a bit better than the Galaxy J7 Star, having a 76.4 score against 73.1. The Motorola Droid Turbo is a incredibly older and notably thicker cellphone than Galaxy J7 Star, but Motorola was able to build it just a bit lighter anyway. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS, but Motorola Droid Turbo has an older 4.4.4 version and Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a much sharper display than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a way higher screen density. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star features much more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 400 GB.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra GPU and 1 GB more RAM. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a little bit better camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking images and/or video in low light situations, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition and a much better 20.7 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Motorola Droid Turbo is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.