Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has a score of 81.2, which is better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 general score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 has older 14 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola Edge 50's design is extremely newer, a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star.
Motorola Edge 50 features a much better looking display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a much better resolution of 1220 x 2712px, a bigger display and a lot greater count of pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola Edge 50 has a much better memory to install games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 features a way better camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a way bigger camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 features a very superior battery life than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.