Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus has an overall score of 79.7, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 score. Even though Motorola Moto G Stylus is newer than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, it is just a little thicker and a bit heavier. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Moto G Stylus has the previous 11 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a bigger display, a better screen density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2300. Moto G Stylus counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 cores, the Moto G Stylus also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G Stylus shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Moto G Stylus also has a much better (4K) video resolution, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a much larger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality.
Moto G Stylus features a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Moto G Stylus features superior battery performance than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Although Moto G Stylus is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy J7 Star. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy J7 Star, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.