Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-07-13 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Blue | Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z4 has a score of 79.8, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's general score of 73.1. The Moto Z4 is a newer phone, and it's also somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Moto Z4 has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Moto Z4 features a little better processing power than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto Z4 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Moto Z4 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a way higher pixels number per inch in the display and a bigger screen.
Motorola Moto Z4 has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Moto Z4 has just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 3600mAh battery size.
The Moto Z4 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Moto Z4 also has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much more megapixels back facing camera and a much bigger sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality.
Although Motorola Moto Z4 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z4, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.