Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, with an 84.9 score against 73.1. Samsung Galaxy A80's construction is newer than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's, but it's somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. The Galaxy A80 features a bit better CPU than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A80 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A80 features a better display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a higher screen density, a larger screen and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy A80 counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A80 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and/or video in low light situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels, a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much higher video definition.
The Galaxy A80 counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 3700mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.