Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the previous 14 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro body is newer and notably thinner, but heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star.
Galaxy J7 Star has a much faster CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 14 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a way better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution, a much bigger screen and a lot more pixels per inch in the display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 73% larger battery size.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a camera in the back with a lot better 50 MP resolution, a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a lot better video quality.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy J7 Star. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Galaxy J7 Star, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.