Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Blue | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has an overall score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than Galaxy J7 Star's general score of 73.1. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X60 Pro has older 11 version while Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie. Vivo X60 Pro's design is incredibly newer, a little lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy J7 Star.
Vivo X60 Pro features a better screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution, a larger screen and more pixels per display inch. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has 10 GB more RAM memory.
Vivo X60 Pro features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. The vivo X60 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, it also counts with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a way better video definition and a way larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs.
The vivo X60 Pro features better battery performance than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.