Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2018-06-07 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro is better than Galaxy J7 V (2018), having a score of 84.9 against 71.9. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy J7 V (2018) comes with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a newer and just a little thinner cellphone than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), although it's also a little heavier.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a way better 1125 x 2436 resolution, a bit larger display and a lot greater pixels count per inch of display. IPhone 11 Pro has a quite better processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and 2 GB more RAM memory.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and video in low-light environments and a lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy J7 V (2018) counts with much more memory to install applications and games than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 400 GB. Galaxy J7 V (2018) counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3046mAh.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy J7 V (2018). So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone 11 Pro, otherwise you can save some money and get the Galaxy J7 V (2018), letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.