Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-07 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has a general score of 85, which is better than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s 71.9 score. Even though the iPhone 8 and the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) were released only 9 months apart, the iPhone 8 is lighter and thinner. The iPhone 8 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 750 x 1334 resolution and a little more pixels per inch of display.
IPhone 8 counts with a better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has 2 lesser cores , and they both have 2 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone 8 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The iPhone 8 features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy J7 V (2018) counts with a superior battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 1821mAh. The Apple iPhone 8 has a better camera than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a back camera with less megapixels resolution and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Although Apple iPhone 8 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy J7 V (2018). So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Apple iPhone 8, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy J7 V (2018), letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.