Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-07 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max is much better than Galaxy J7 V (2018), with an 84.5 score against 71.9. The Apple iPhone XS Max construction is heavier but thinner than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and they were only released 4 months apart. IPhone XS Max has a lot better looking screen than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a much better 1242 x 2688 resolution, a bigger display and a much greater pixels count per inch of screen.
The Galaxy J7 V (2018) has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than iPhone XS Max, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 400 GB. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a quite better processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has 2 less cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory and a 64 bits processor.
IPhone XS Max has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photos or videos in low-light environments and a back facing camera with less MP, it also counts with a way better video definition. The Galaxy J7 V (2018) features just a little better battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3179mAh.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018). So if you need that extra specs, you can buy iPhone XS Max, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.