Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), with an 81.2 score against 71.9. These phones include Android operating system, but the LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The LG V40 ThinQ design is a little lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy J7 V (2018), even though they were released with only 4 months difference.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a much better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a larger display. LG V40 ThinQ has a quite superior performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM.
LG V40 ThinQ shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a lower 12 MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy J7 V (2018) and the LG V40 ThinQ have incredibly similar batteries.
LG V40 ThinQ not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.