Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-07 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s general score of 71.9. The LG V50 ThinQ body is newer and a bit thinner, but also a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018). These devices use Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
LG V50 ThinQ has a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a larger screen, a lot better pixels quantity per screen inch and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120. LG V50 ThinQ features a faster processing unit than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior camera than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger aperture. LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ features better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 21 percent bigger battery size.
The LG V50 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than Galaxy J7 V (2018), but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.