Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has a global score of 77.9, which is a bit better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s 71.9 global score. Although Motorola DROID Turbo is way older and a lot thicker than Galaxy J7 V (2018), it's construction is still just a little bit lighter. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Motorola DROID Turbo has older 4.4.4 version while Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with more RAM and a GPU. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better looking screen than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better pixels density and a way better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Motorola DROID Turbo features just a bit better camera than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) has a much greater memory for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 400 GB. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Motorola DROID Turbo is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.