Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is way better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s general score of 71.9. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version while Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a way newer and a little bit thinner phone than Galaxy J7 V (2018), but it is just a little heavier.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 5G also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a greater number of pixels per display inch and a larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a greater camera than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has longer battery performance than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 36% greater battery size.
The Galaxy A71 5G is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.