Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 240.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s global score of 71.9. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the previous 14 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), it's extremely thinner and also notably newer.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a much bigger display, a way higher pixels quantity per inch of screen and a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy J7 V (2018) has a very superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 14 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 73% more battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have the same camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much better video definition and a way more mega pixels camera.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018). So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.