Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro is a little bit better than Galaxy J7 V (2018), having a 78.8 score against 71.9. Vivo X60 Pro is a newer device, and it is also thinner and just a bit lighter than Galaxy J7 V (2018). Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but the vivo X60 Pro has an older 11 version while Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Vivo X60 Pro features a faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2376, a larger screen and a higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The vivo X60 Pro has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The vivo X60 Pro has better battery duration than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 27% larger battery size.
The vivo X60 Pro has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.