Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-04-29 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.41 x 2.79 x 0.65 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 819.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 5 Hexa chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz + Dual-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T624 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2430mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has an overall score of 76.9, which is a bit better than Galaxy K Zoom's overall score of 70.3. Samsung Galaxy A70's design is a lot newer, noticeably thinner and just a little bit lighter than Galaxy K Zoom. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A70 has older 10 version while Galaxy K Zoom has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Samsung Galaxy K Zoom has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A70, although it has a really smaller display, a just a little less pixels per inch of screen and a way worse 1280 x 720 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy K Zoom, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy K Zoom, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB and more internal storage. Galaxy K Zoom counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy K Zoom also has faster video frame rates and a bigger camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy A70 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy K Zoom, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy A70 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.