Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is better than Samsung Galaxy M01, getting an 85 score against 74.7. IPhone 8's design is notably thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy M01, even though it was released many years before. IPhone 8 features a quite better performance than Galaxy M01, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
IPhone 8 features a sharper display than Galaxy M01, because although it has a little worse 750 x 1334 pixels resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little greater amount of pixels in each inch in the screen. IPhone 8 features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M01, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy M01 has a way better battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has a 120 percent larger battery size. The iPhone 8 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera sensor shooting higher quality photos, a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and a way better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.