Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is better than Galaxy M01, with an 84.5 score against 74.7. The iPhone XS Max body is noticeably thinner than the Galaxy M01, although it's heavier and was released around a year before. Apple iPhone XS Max features a more powerful processor than Galaxy M01, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and 1 GB more RAM memory.
The Apple iPhone XS Max has an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a lot better 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution, a bit larger screen and a lot greater display pixels density. Samsung Galaxy M01 has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy M01 counts with longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3179mAh. The iPhone XS Max captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has a lesser MP camera in the back, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.