Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M01's 74.7 global score. Google Pixel 2's design is a lot thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy M01, even though it was released 3 years before. Google Pixel 2 counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy M01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel count per inch of screen and a better 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution. Google Pixel 2 counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has a back camera with a lower 12.2 MP resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor, a larger aperture and a way better (4K) video resolution.
The Google Pixel 2 has slightly more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy M01, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy M01 counts with a much better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 48 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.