Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a global score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy M01's general score of 74.7. The LG V40 ThinQ is an older and just a bit heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy M01, but LG was able to build it way thinner anyway. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but the LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy M01 has Android 11.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a better screen than Galaxy M01, because it has a little bigger screen, a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a way higher number of pixels per inch in the display. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy M01, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG V40 ThinQ takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy M01, because although it has a camera with less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a larger back-facing camera sensor and a lot bigger aperture. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage.
Galaxy M01 features greater battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.