Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy M01's general score of 74.7. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy M01 has Android 11. The LG V50 ThinQ body is somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy M01, although it's just a little bit heavier and was released just a bit further than a year before.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much better looking screen than Galaxy M01, because it has a bit bigger display, way more pixels per inch in the display and a lot better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy M01, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has a worse 12 MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments, a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality pictures.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy M01, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ's battery life is just as good as Samsung Galaxy M01's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.