Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-08-24 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is better than the Samsung Galaxy M01, having a global score of 87.1 against 74.7. The Galaxy Note9 construction is thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M01, although it is somewhat heavier and was released just 22 months before. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a much higher 1440 x 2960 resolution, much more pixels per display inch and a little bigger display.
Galaxy Note9 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M01, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has a lesser mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a way larger camera aperture for better low light photography.
The Galaxy Note9 has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M01, and although they both have an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy Note9 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a battery duration that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy M01's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.