Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M01, having a score of 77.8 against 74.7. These phones have Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has newer 14 version and Samsung Galaxy M01 has Android 11 version, so it counts with some additional features. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro body is incredibly newer and notably thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M01's, but it's also much heavier.
The Galaxy M01 counts with a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy M01, because it has a much bigger screen, a higher display pixel density and a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M01, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a way bigger aperture, a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back-facing camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.