Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a score of 84.9, which is better than Samsung Galaxy M10's score of 73.5. Although it's the best in this review, Apple iPhone 11 Pro's construction is heavier and a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy M10. Apple iPhone 11 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy M10 works with Android 9.0 Pie OS.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a lot better screen than Galaxy M10, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a much greater count of pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy M10 counts with a much greater storage for apps and games than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
IPhone 11 Pro counts with a better performing processing unit than Galaxy M10, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with 1 GB more RAM and a 64-bit processor. IPhone 11 Pro features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has a lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger sensor taking higher quality videos and photos, a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low-light environments.
Galaxy M10 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.