Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 is better than Samsung Galaxy M10, getting a score of 85 against 73.5. The Apple iPhone 8 is an older phone than the Samsung Galaxy M10, but Apple made it just a little lighter and a little thinner. The iPhone 8 has a much better looking screen than Galaxy M10, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 750 x 1334px and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixel number in each inch of display.
IPhone 8 has a better performing processor than Galaxy M10, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and 2 less cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. Apple iPhone 8 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy M10 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has an 87% larger battery capacity. IPhone 8 counts with a better camera than Galaxy M10, because although it has a less MP camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger sensor shooting better quality pictures, a way better (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.