Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max has a score of 84.5, which is better than Galaxy M10's 73.5 general score. Apple iPhone XS Max's body has the same thickness than the Galaxy M10, but it is incredibly heavier. IPhone XS Max features an incredibly better display than Galaxy M10, because it has a much higher amount of pixels per display inch, a bit larger display and a way better resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels.
Galaxy M10 counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. IPhone XS Max features a greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone XS Max has a better camera than Galaxy M10, because although it has a camera in the back with less megapixels, it also counts with a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited environments and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy M10 has just a little bit longer battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 3400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.