Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 has a general score of 79.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy M10's general score of 73.5. Even though LG V30 is older than Galaxy M10, it's construction is just a bit lighter and a little bit thinner. LG V30 features a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a lot more pixels per inch in the screen.
LG V30 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy M10, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V30 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. LG V30 has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy M10, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy M10 has a bit longer battery performance than LG V30, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The LG V30 takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a much higher video definition, a camera in the back with a higher 16 mega pixels resolution, a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.