Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is much better than the Galaxy M10's general score of 73.5. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G has the older 11 version and Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy A71 5G body is newer, but just a bit thicker and heavier than Galaxy M10.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a sharper screen than Galaxy M10, because it has a greater display density, a much higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit larger screen. Galaxy A71 5G has much more storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy M10, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy A71 5G features longer battery performance than Galaxy M10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy M10, because it has a bigger aperture, a camera with much more mega pixels, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a lot better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.