Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 edge+ is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M10, getting a 79.3 score against 73.5. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S6 edge+ is extremely older than Samsung Galaxy M10, it's construction is a bit lighter and a bit thinner. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy S6 edge+ has the previous 5.1 version and Samsung Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a lot better looking display than Galaxy M10, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a lot better screen pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy M10 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy M10 counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with more cpu cores. The Galaxy M10 has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy S6 edge+ captures better photos and videos than Galaxy M10, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also has a way higher (4K) video definition, a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.