Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than Galaxy M10's global score of 73.5. Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is heavier than Galaxy M10, it's extremely thinner and way newer. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has older 14 version while Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy M10 has a very superior processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 13 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a lot better pixel quantity per screen inch, a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a bigger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a camera in the back with much more mega pixels, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a bigger aperture for better low-light captures.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M10, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.