Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 has an overall score of 85, which is much better than the Galaxy M11's score of 74.8. Apple iPhone 8's body is much lighter and thinner than Galaxy M11, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. IPhone 8 features a superior processing unit than Galaxy M11, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The iPhone 8 has a more vivid display than Galaxy M11, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower 750 x 1334px resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixels count in each inch in the screen. The iPhone 8 shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M11, because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the iPhone 8 also counts with a larger camera sensor and a lot better (4K) video quality.
IPhone 8 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M11, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy M11 has a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.