Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max is much better than the Galaxy M11, getting a score of 84.5 against 74.8. Despite of the fact Apple iPhone XS Max is older and just a little heavier than the Galaxy M11, it's construction is still somewhat thinner. The Apple iPhone XS Max has a better processor than Galaxy M11, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor and more RAM.
Apple iPhone XS Max features a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy M11, because it has a lot better count of pixels per inch in the screen, a bit larger display and a much higher 1242 x 2688px resolution. Galaxy M11 counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than iPhone XS Max, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Apple iPhone XS Max captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy M11, because although it has a lower 12 megapixels resolution back camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy M11 has a much better battery lifetime than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 57 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.