Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M11's 74.8 global score. Although the Google Pixel 2 is notably older than the Samsung Galaxy M11, it's design is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner. Google Pixel 2 counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M11, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution and a way greater pixels density.
The Google Pixel 2 features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy M11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 2 also has 1 GB more RAM. Google Pixel 2 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy M11, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 12.2 megapixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality and a larger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M11, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M11 features a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.