Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL has a general score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Galaxy M11's overall score of 74.8. The Google Pixel XL body is lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Galaxy M11, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Google Pixel XL has a better screen than Galaxy M11, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per screen inch and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Google Pixel XL counts with just a bit bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M11, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy M11 and the Google Pixel XL feature quite similar processing units, because although the Google Pixel XL has 4 lesser cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel XL features a slightly better camera than Galaxy M11, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking images or video in low light environments and a camera in the back with a worse resolution, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
Galaxy M11 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 45 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.