Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is better than the Galaxy M11's 74.8 general score. LG V50 ThinQ is an older cellphone than the Galaxy M11, but LG made it a little bit thinner and just a little lighter anyway. These devices work with the same Android 10 operating system. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better display than Galaxy M11, and although they both have a same size display, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a much higher count of pixels per screen inch.
The LG V50 ThinQ has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M11, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. LG V50 ThinQ has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M11, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy M11 features improved battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size. LG V50 ThinQ has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy M11, because although it has a back facing camera with less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light photography, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.