Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Black and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is just a bit better than the Galaxy M11, having an 81 score against 74.8. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version while Galaxy M11 has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and some performance improvements. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro construction is incredibly thinner and a little lighter than Galaxy M11, although it was released 3 years before.
Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy M11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has 3 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy M11, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M11, because although it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy M11, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy C9 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with more megapixels.
Galaxy M11 has better battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.