Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than Galaxy M11's 74.8 global score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a newer 14 version and Galaxy M11 has Android 10, so it offers a couple nice extra features. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro design is noticeably newer and a lot thinner than the Galaxy M11's, although it is heavier.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better display than Galaxy M11, because it has a much better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a larger display and a way greater display density. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M11, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy M11 features a very superior processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features just a little better battery life than Galaxy M11, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M11, because it has a bigger aperture for better photography and video in low light situations, a lot better video quality, a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.