Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has an overall score of 85.5, which is better than Samsung Galaxy M11's score of 74.8. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a just a little lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy M11, but both are equally thin. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy M11, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 5 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a brighter display than Galaxy M11, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2246 resolution and a better amount of pixels per screen inch. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy M11, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a less megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger sensor and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M11, because although it has an external SD slot that supports 256 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy M11 features improved battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.