Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-03-18 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| PLS | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max has a general score of 84.5, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy M12's 80 score. The Apple iPhone XS Max construction is a little lighter and a lot thinner than the Galaxy M12, although it was released many years before. IPhone XS Max features a more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone XS Max has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M12, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the iPhone XS Max also has a way greater display density and a lot higher 1242 x 2688 resolution. Galaxy M12 counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy M12 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy M12 has a way better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has an 89 percent greater battery capacity. The Galaxy M12 captures clearer photographs and videos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy M12 also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.